OVERVIEW
It seems clear that India has a couple of painful years ahead of it as it grapples with AI reducing the demand for labour in sectors which lie at the heart of middle-class income generation e.g., Financial Services, IT Services, Media and Manufacturing. However, it is also evident that technology is creating new jobs in India most notably in the gig economy (in which 8 mn Indians work). Since many of new pockets of job creation are novel in nature e.g., YouTubers, coders on the dark web, bot trainers, data cleaners, etc, it is difficult for us to fully comprehend the scale of job creation taking place in India. Given the largely unfettered play of free market forces in the heart of the Indian economy (away from sectors where the Government messes around), we believe it is more likely than not that technology will help rather than hinder India’s march to prosperity.
“In the story of AI and humans, if we get the dance between artificial intelligence and human society right, it would unquestionably be the single greatest achievement in human history.’ – Kai-Fu Lee, Chen Qiufan et al in ‘AI 2041: Ten Visions for Our Future’ (2021)
The “substitution” of workers with machines
The downturn in urban consumption and the challenges facing India’s middle class has received plenty of attention over the past year. In our 24th November 2024 blog, Why is the Indian Middle-Class Suffering? , we noted that one of the drivers of this downturn has been the automation in offices & factories of clerical, secretarial and managerial roles requiring routine and/or repetitive work. More generally, labour economists have commented that this replacement of workers with machines is a widespread phenomenon in the developed economies. Daniel Susskind writes in his book ‘A World Without Work: Technology, Automation and How We Should Respond’ (2020):
“The traditionally plump midriffs of many economies, which have provided middle-class people with well-paid jobs in the past, are disappearing. In many countries, as a share of overall employment there are now more high-paid professionals and managers – as well as more low-paid care workers and cleaners, teaching and healthcare assistants, caretakers and gardeners, waiters and hairdressers. But there are fewer middling-pay secretaries and administrative clerks, production workers and salespeople.”
However, automation anxiety is not new. Concerns regarding the replacement of human beings by the latest machines have been omnipresent since the Luddites began vandalising James Hargreaves’ spinning jenny and John Kay’s flying shuttle in the 1730s in northern England. And yet in spite of the fact that the Luddites’ concerns were justified – mechanical looms did replace skilled weavers in England – the West has moved forward for several centuries with the middle class being a key beneficiary of that progress. So, why is it that middle classes in the West flourished in spite of wave after wave of mechanisation & automation in the workplace?
The “complementarity” between humans and machines
“When patterns are broken, new worlds emerge.” —Tuli Kupferberg
Whilst the substitution of workers with machines is well understood (see the lower left quadrant in exhibit 1), historically what has been even more powerful in the Western context is the “complementary” effects between technology and labour. Complementary effects are harder to identify than substitution effects partly because, chronologically, they come AFTER substitution effects have already kicked in and partly because they involve novel use cases which are hard to envisage when the first wave of tech disruption plays in. For example, when electricity was discovered in the late 19th century, it was obvious that candle makers would lose their jobs to electric lights. What was not obvious was that within a generation electricity would dramatically increase workplace productivity, GDP growth and therefore employment. What nobody could have predicted in the late nineteenth century was that electricity – via the gramophone – would increase both the demand for musicians and their career earnings.
To be precise, the complementary force works in FOUR different ways.
- Technology creates new jobs where none existed previously – For example, the rise of smartphones and low-cost broadband has been central to the creation of the gig economy. And whilst some might say that the rise of ride share is simply a “substitution” of a traditional taxi driver with a Ola/Uber, it is relatively clear that many segments of the gig economy e.g. hairdressers, therapists, plumbers, electricians, domestic helpers, etc have resulted in the creation of net new jobs (rather than simply substituting a conventional profession with its gig economy counterpart).
- Technology increases labour productivity, their earning and spending capacity, & newer job opportunities – As Daniel Susskind says in ‘A World Without Work (2020): “Perhaps the most obvious way that the complementing force helps human beings is that new technologies, even if they displace some workers, often make other workers more productive at their tasks….Take a taxi driver who uses a sat-nav system to follow unfamiliar roads, an architect who uses computer-assisted design software to craft more complex buildings, or an accountant who uses tax computation software to handle harder, more intractable calculations. All are likely to become better at their tasks as a result….”
- Technology lowers cost of production and therefore, boosts demand and creates jobs – In ‘A World Without Work: Technology, Automation and How We Should Respond’ (2020), Daniel Susskind uses the example of a lawyer to explain how this dynamic works: “ Think of a lawyer who is displaced from the task of looking through stacks of papers by an automated document review system, a piece of software that can scan legal material far more swiftly – and, in many cases, more precisely, too. The same lawyer can now turn her attention to other tasks involved in providing legal advice, perhaps meeting face-to-face with her clients or applying her problem-solving skills to a particularly tricky legal conundrum. In all these cases, if productivity increases are passed on to customers via lower prices or better-quality services, then the demand for whatever goods and services are being provided is likely to rise, and the demand for human workers along with it.”
- Technology fosters growth and prosperity by improving overall efficiency: Improved efficiency generates prosperity and demand for goods and services which in turn creates jobs (albeit in sectors very different from the ones where jobs are being lost). This is perhaps the most powerful impact of technology, and it is the one which is hardest to detect in the short run. We refer again to Mr Susskind’s away-winning book:
“…if we think again of the economy as a pie, technological progress has made the pie far bigger. As previously noted, over the last few hundred years, economic output has soared. The UK, for instance, has seen its economy grow 113-fold from 1700 to 2000. And that is nothing compared to other countries that were less-developed at the start of this period: over the same three hundred years, the Japanese economy grew 171-fold…and the US economy a whopping 15,241-fold. Intuitively, growth like this is likely to have helped workers. As an economy grows, and people become more prosperous with healthier incomes to spend, the opportunities for work are likely to improve. Yes, some tasks might be automated and lost to machines. But as the economy expands, and demand for goods and services rises along with it, demand will also increase for all the tasks that are needed to produce them.” – Daniel Susskind in ‘A World Without Work: Technology, Automation and How We Should Respond’ (2020).
Is India benefiting from the “complementary” effects of technology?
Whilst – as noted in our 24th November 2024 Why is the Indian Middle-Class Suffering? blog – jobs are being lost in financial services, IT services, media and manufacturing courtesy the widespread use of robotisation and automation in these sectors, it is all but certain that jobs are being created elsewhere in the Indian economy. So, where are those jobs being created?
New job creation in India
“We’re making this analogy that AI is the new electricity. Electricity transformed industries: agriculture, transportation, communication, manufacturing.” – Andrew Ng, former head of Google Brain, current Amazon board member
As with electricity, so with the latest wave of technology, new job creation is all but certain. The more interesting question is in which parts of the Indian economy will these jobs be created in.
Things that are already happening at scale:
1. Gig economy: The gig economy in India is around $0.5 tn (or around 15% of GDP) in terms of economic activity (source: India’s gig economy set to hit $455 billion this year: Report [ET Retail.com]) Whilst there are all sorts of fantastic reports of how many people work in the gig economy in India, the most reliable estimate seems to be around the 8 mn mark (see Tech gig economy grows, India to have 23.5 million workers by 2030 [Economic Times]).
According to a report in Business Standard, Uber has more than 1 million drivers in India, its chief executive Dara Khosrowshahi said during the ride-hailing platform’s March-quarter earnings call. As mentioned on Zomato’s official social media, it has more than 350,000 delivery partners in the country.
“According to a report by the government think-tank NITI Aayog, India’s gig workforce is expected to expand to 23.5 million workers by 2029-30, three times the estimated 7.7 million in 2020-21. Another report by the Boston Consulting Group predicts that the gig economy has the potential to serve up to 90 million jobs (roughly 30% of India’s non-farm workforce),” (Source: https://www.indiaspend.com/welfare/indias-gig-workers-remain-undocumented-unprotected-912846)
2. YouTubers & influencers: A staggering 80mn+ Indians are making videos on YouTube. The top 1% of them – around 200K YouTubers – earn on average Rs. 12 lakh per annum. However, research conducted by Kalaari Capital shows that this average figure is misleading because the most successful YouTubers in India earn much more than Rs 12 lakhs per annum: “Less than 1 per cent of professional creators (those with over 1 million followers) have the potential to earn between $2500-65K (Rs. 53 lakh) per month.” (Source: https://telecom.economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/8cr-creators-in-india-but-1-5-lakh-able-to-earn-most-make-just-rs-16k-a-month/94768398)
We are on the same page as Kalaari Capital on this point – we know several influencers who are making millions of dollars each year In India and their success is pulling in millions of more creators on to YouTube.
3. Data cleaning, bot training and tech R&D in Indian GCCs: As highlighted in Chapter 8 of our bestselling book, ‘Behold the Leviathan: the Unusual Rise of Modern India’, regardless of what happens to employment in the Indian IT Services sector, GCCs (Global Capability Centres) are booming in India with 2 new GCCs opening each week adding to the stock of 1700 GCCs already open in India. GCCs employ ~2 mn people in India and much of the work being done in the GCCs is directly related to the latest wave of technological change.
The GCC boom in turn has helped foster a broader SME ecosystem in India which acts as suppliers to the GCCS. As Leslie D’Monte and Jayanth Kolla note in their book ‘AI Rising: India’s Artificial Intelligence Growth Story’ (2023): “Smaller firms took on data cleaning, structuring, and vectorisation as a service to support MNCs in their AI operations. India has also been fast emerging as an AI R&D centre. Currently, India is the second-largest global hub in the training and hiring of AI talent (the first being the US), accelerated by the rapid growth in AI applications. MNCs have been driving R&D in AI via various initiatives, ranging from strategic innovation management in the ecosystem to research labs and large-scale R&D centres and centres of excellence, or CoEs.”
Whilst we could not find a precise count of how many bot training jobs there are in India, you can see on online employment classifieds sites that there are tens of thousands of job openings in India in this field. For example, on India’s largest employment classifieds site, Naukri.com, alone there are 50K vacancies for bot trainers (see https://www.naukri.com/bot-jobs).
As the cost of training bots falls, it is highly likely that bots will be used for increasingly niche use cases. For example, the celebrated corporate coach Marshall Goldsmith recently launched his corporate bot. So those executives who can’t pay the several thousand dollars required to hire Marshall, can now speak with his bot (for a lower fee) – see https://marshallgoldsmith.ai/.
As Nandan Nilekani says in R. Jagannathan’s ‘The Jobs Crisis in India’ (2018): “We should expect a larger number of smaller entities that create jobs and a lesser number of larger entities that create jobs.”
4. Jobs on the dark web: There is good reason to believe that Indian techies are finding jobs on the dark web. These jobs often involve cybercrime such as hacking, creation of content on prohibited subjects, trading cryptocurrency, and intermediating in trades in prohibited substances (see https://www.quora.com/Is-there-a-way-to-make-a-career-on-the-dark-web-and-dark-net).
Payment of these tech services are in bitcoin and our discussions with law enforcement officers suggests that this industry is thriving in India as it is very difficult for conventional law enforcement efforts to identify the perpetrators of cybercrime. In fact, many financial entities have become victims of impersonation in the recent past, eventually affecting the general public. The latter have also been getting hammered by cybercrime perpetrators while law enforcement has been trying to deal with such incidents effectively.. For obvious reasons it is hard to estimate how many Indians are involved in such activities, but we reckon that post-Covid there has been explosion in cybercrime and dark web activity in India. Our reckoning is that it is more likely than not that several million Indians are working on the dark web and earning cryptocurrency.
Conclusion: Complementary effects are likely to create newer, unimaginable job opportunities
“Just as the mobile Internet led to roles like the Uber driver, the coming of AI will create jobs we cannot even conceive of yet.” – Kai-Fu Lee & Chen Qiufan in ‘AI 2041: Ten Visions for Our Future’ (2024)
Whilst it seems clear that India has a couple of painful years ahead of it as it grapples with technology reducing the demand for labour in sectors which lie at the heart of middle-class income generation e.g. Financial Services, IT Services, Media and Manufacturing, it is also evident that technology is creating new jobs in India. More specifically, the tech powered gig economy already employs around 8mn people and is predicted to employ twice as many people within five years.
As R. Jagannathan says in his book ‘The Jobs Crisis in India’ (2018) – “Unlike the advanced nations, where automation is killings jobs, but an older and aging population is unable to upskill, in India our population is young and teachable. They are also quick adapters to technology, as we have seen with the mobile penetration we have achieved and in the massive expansion in smartphones as data tariffs were slashed throughout late 2016 and 2017 after the entry of Reliance Jio…”
In fact, Kai-Fu Lee & Chen Qiufan’s celebrated book ‘AI 2041: Ten Visions for Our Future ’, the authors have in chapter 8 pictorially shown which areas are likely to be susceptible to AI automation (see exhibit 1) and have explained that “Jobs that are asocial and routine, such as telemarketers or insurance adjusters, are likely to be taken over in their entirety… These are the three capabilities where I see AI falling short, and that AI will likely still struggle to master even in 2041: Creativity,…Empathy,…and Dexterity….”
However, since these new pockets of job creation in contemporary India are novel in nature e.g. YouTubers, coders on the dark web, gig economy workers, bot trainers, etc, it is difficult for us to fully comprehend the scale of the job creation taking place in India. In fact, even in America, between 2005-15, 94% of the growth in jobs was in the ‘alternative’ category as per research conducted by the eminent economists Lawrence Katz & Alan Krueger (source: Katz, L. F., & Krueger, A. B. (2019). Understanding trends in alternative work arrangements in the United States. RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences, 5(5), 132-146).
Given the more or less unfettered play of free market forces in the heart of the Indian economy (away from sectors where the Government messes around), it is more likely than not that job creation in India too will now increasingly arise from use cases and professions that we can’t fully comprehend as yet. Technology will continue aiding rather than hindering, ‘the unusual rise of modern India’.
Saurabh Mukherjea works for Marcellus Investment Managers (www.marcellus.in). Amazon forms part of Marcellus’ Global Compounders Portfolio, a strategy offered by GIFT City branch of Marcellus Investment Managers Private Limited. Hence, we as Marcellus, our immediate relatives and our clients may have interest and stakes in the mentioned stock. The stock mentioned are for educational purposes only and not recommendatory.”
Note: The above material is neither investment research, nor investment advice. Marcellus does not seek payment for or business from this material/email in any shape or form. Marcellus Investment Managers Private Limited (“Marcellus”) is regulated by the Securities and Exchange Board of India (“SEBI”) as a provider of Portfolio Management Services. Marcellus is also a US Securities & Exchange Commission (“US SEC”) registered Investment Advisor. No content of this publication including the performance related information is verified by SEBI or US SEC. If any recipient or reader of this material is based outside India and USA, please note that Marcellus may not be regulated in such jurisdiction and this material is not a solicitation to use Marcellus’s services. All recipients of this material must before dealing and or transacting in any of the products and services referred to in this material must make their own investigation, seek appropriate professional advice. This communication is confidential and privileged and is directed to and for the use of the addressee only. The recipient, if not the addressee, should not use this material if erroneously received, and access and use of this material in any manner by anyone other than the addressee is unauthorized. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender by return email and immediately destroy all copies of this message and any attachments and delete it from your computer system, permanently. No liability whatsoever is assumed by Marcellus as a result of the recipient or any other person relying upon the opinion unless otherwise agreed in writing. The recipient acknowledges that Marcellus may be unable to exercise control or ensure or guarantee the integrity of the text of the material/email message and the text is not warranted as to its completeness and accuracy. The material, names and branding of the investment style do not provide any impression or a claim that these products/strategies achieve the respective objectives. Further, past performance is not indicative of future results. Marcellus and/or its associates, the authors of this material (including their relatives) may have financial interest by way of investments in the companies covered in this material. Marcellus does not receive compensation from the companies for their coverage in this material. Marcellus does not provide any market making service to any company covered in this material. In the past 12 months, Marcellus and its associates have never i) managed or co-managed any public offering of securities; ii) have not offered investment banking or merchant banking or brokerage services; or iii) have received any compensation or other benefits from the company or third party in connection with this coverage. Authors of this material have never served the companies in a capacity of a director, officer, or an employee. This material may contain confidential or proprietary information and user shall take prior written consent from Marcellus before any reproduction in any form.